Ellie Mae heads to Harvard
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Monday, December 20, 2010
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Monday, December 6, 2010
Monday, November 29, 2010
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Monday, November 22, 2010
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Friday, November 5, 2010
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Monday, October 4, 2010
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Friday, September 24, 2010
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Friday, August 27, 2010
Friday, August 20, 2010
Friday, August 6, 2010
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Monday, July 12, 2010
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Friday, June 18, 2010
Saturday, May 29, 2010
What's Next - Brockman
This is a compilation of cutting edge interdisciplinary research. Josh Greene has an essay in this, which is why it was bought and read it.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Power - Robert Greene
Interesting take on the sources of power; a bit harsh and certainly specific to power.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Mindset The New Psychology of Success - Dweck
Fixed or Growth are the two mindsets. Fixed is simply that you feel predisposed to be how you are. Growth means that you learn from experiences and do not fear new experiences or possible failure.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Sources of Power How People Make Decisions - Klein
Ah, not enough real research and a whole bunch of conjecture. Some good ideas though. The guy was married to firefighters and pilots - couldn't he find somebody else to track.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Changing Minds - Howard Gardner
This professor teaches Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. The book was very informative and I've already begun to implement many of the theories - one of which is a winner and I'm sending it to you separately.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Leading Teams
Wow, I love real researchers.
His research tells us simply that teams work - or not - well, it depends. Of course it depends. A poorly structured team will suck regardless of the dynamics of the leader and a well defined and structured team will be successful without a great leader; however, a great leader will make a difference at the margin.
His research tells us simply that teams work - or not - well, it depends. Of course it depends. A poorly structured team will suck regardless of the dynamics of the leader and a well defined and structured team will be successful without a great leader; however, a great leader will make a difference at the margin.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Fruit Flies of the Moral Mind: Greene
He does a lot with the fMRI and I'm interested in where he's heading with this.
Sunday, March 28, 2010
The Checklist Manifesto - How to Get Things Right
Atul Gawande - I'm looking forward to his lecture.
The book tells stories of his quest to insert a checklist into surgery and many stories of its success.
The book tells stories of his quest to insert a checklist into surgery and many stories of its success.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Deepening Democracy
This was referred to me by your Law School, the author is a Harvard professor. At any rate, the book outlines deliberative democracy. Unfortunately, success requires that the deliberators are somewhat selfless and willing to do what's the greater good. Oh, well.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Greene: The Secret Joke of Kant's Soul
Seems to differentiate deontological and consequentialist moral judgement. Just when I thought I had a label it escaped me.
I guess I need to read Kant. I need to figure out what determines morality; 'cause it appears I ain't gettin' it.
The critiques were interesting.
I guess I need to read Kant. I need to figure out what determines morality; 'cause it appears I ain't gettin' it.
The critiques were interesting.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Switch - How to Change Things When Change is Hard
The Heath brothers.
Unfortunately, it hinted at a self help book; however, many of the concepts have good research behind them. Basically, it's about the three components of making change: logic, emotion and direction. No one component will allow a change to continue - all three need to be addressed.
The book was a valuable read and one that I am actually using.
Unfortunately, it hinted at a self help book; however, many of the concepts have good research behind them. Basically, it's about the three components of making change: logic, emotion and direction. No one component will allow a change to continue - all three need to be addressed.
The book was a valuable read and one that I am actually using.
Monday, March 8, 2010
The Quants
This book is about the mathematical geniuses that made billions investing. It's very interesting; however, the author is rather immature and the timelines are confusing. But, the point is made. I thought the best part was the fact that two firms were successful and the statement was made "They were just smarter than the rest." I liked that.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Made to Stick
Written by brothers, and, yes they mention that one is a Stanford professor of behavioral science and the other did research at Harvard.
Kinda like Gladwell, only they did some of their own research. Good insights into communication mechanisms that allow you to get folks to remember what you said.
The most important parts seem to be that we must keep in mind the core message, sometimes we confuse ourselves and secondly, make it specifically simple.
Anyway, a good read.
Kinda like Gladwell, only they did some of their own research. Good insights into communication mechanisms that allow you to get folks to remember what you said.
The most important parts seem to be that we must keep in mind the core message, sometimes we confuse ourselves and secondly, make it specifically simple.
Anyway, a good read.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
On the Brink
The days of decision making for Treasury Secretary Paulson were very well written. Assuming that his portrayal is accurate it was very interesting to read about the stress of the situation and the way the group worked together to solve the puzzles.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency: Greene, et al
Yeah, interesting stuff; however, I don't see the questions as being quite so black and white. Although, my answers would have been in line with the normal folk.
Did you get a candy bar or $3 for taking your retard quiz?
Did you get a candy bar or $3 for taking your retard quiz?
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Cognition: Greene, et al
Interesting point of the experiment:
The instructions acknowledged that the dilemmas were not necessarily realistic and requested that subjects "suspend disbelief." Data from 31 (of 664) subjects who reported being unable/unwilling to suspend disbelief ("conscious realists") were excluded form the analysis, as were data from 10 subjects reporting confusion.
First of all "form" should have been from - that's just to clarify the next point, being that there are more of us out there than just you and me who take these test and are confused.
So, this pertains to the trolley deal where you have the choice of pitching somebody in front of the trolley killing one to save five. I feel very good about my situation because being confused by the time I made a decision it would have been over.
Also interesting is that the test subjects were 271 females, 337 males and 12 genders unknown. Does that have something to do with the retardation issue. How is a gender unknown, and if they can't discern their gender how valid is their response - or were ten of those the confused folk?
The instructions acknowledged that the dilemmas were not necessarily realistic and requested that subjects "suspend disbelief." Data from 31 (of 664) subjects who reported being unable/unwilling to suspend disbelief ("conscious realists") were excluded form the analysis, as were data from 10 subjects reporting confusion.
First of all "form" should have been from - that's just to clarify the next point, being that there are more of us out there than just you and me who take these test and are confused.
So, this pertains to the trolley deal where you have the choice of pitching somebody in front of the trolley killing one to save five. I feel very good about my situation because being confused by the time I made a decision it would have been over.
Also interesting is that the test subjects were 271 females, 337 males and 12 genders unknown. Does that have something to do with the retardation issue. How is a gender unknown, and if they can't discern their gender how valid is their response - or were ten of those the confused folk?
Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions
Greene and Paxton
Yep, this was new territory for me - honest moral decisions - I can do honest and I can do moral, but the combination is a stretch.
Yep, this was new territory for me - honest moral decisions - I can do honest and I can do moral, but the combination is a stretch.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Attitude by Banaji and Heiphetz
Interesting for certain.
I need to get used to how papers are written in order to get more from the content. A great deal of effort was spent in how the work was created. I'll catch on.
I need to get used to how papers are written in order to get more from the content. A great deal of effort was spent in how the work was created. I'll catch on.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Look at the Birdie
I really enjoy the depth of the short stories.
At first I thought the endings were blunt and short; however, I found them thought provoking and really enjoyable.
At first I thought the endings were blunt and short; however, I found them thought provoking and really enjoyable.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Sunday, January 3, 2010
The Big Breakfast Diet
This caught my interest because it is written by an MD who appears to have some sound research behind her assertions; also, I've had an inkling that timing of meals makes a difference.
We'll see.
We'll see.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)